SKYBRIDGE COMMAND OS / DEMONSTRATION RELEASE

Resilience you can see.
Engineering you can inspect.

Explore a satellite-to-surface-to-underground network concept through a working disaster sandbox, transparent planning calculations, and a lab integration blueprint.

Simulation and planning only — no physical network control or verified live telemetry

Skybridge at a glance

One ecosystem. Four resilient network layers. Clearly separated demonstration and field validation.

01 · War Room

Run modeled hurricanes, fiber cuts, power failures, and untrusted-device incidents. Inspect route decisions and simulated packet metrics.

Open simulator

02 · Municipal Designer

Estimate device density, transport nodes, radio propagation, and backup battery needs. Print a board-ready preliminary scope.

Plan a location

03 · Lab & Trust

See the exact telemetry connector requirements and explore a hardware-identity handshake demonstration without exposing your ProBox.

Visit lab

Architecture: sky → edge → surface → below

SATFBREDGERLYRLYUG

Diagram is conceptual. Tunnel coverage requires engineered distribution such as fiber-fed access points, distributed antennas, or leaky feeder.

Operational boundaries

  • Open public demo with synthetic data only.
  • No public access to real equipment or secrets.
  • Coverage and availability require field surveys.
  • Production-grade cryptographic identity requires real TPM/secure-element enrollment.

Disaster War Room

Interactive, deterministic disaster simulation with inspectable route states.

SYNTHETIC DATA / NO ACTUAL NETWORK SWITCHING

Choose the event

All events and numerical outcomes are illustrative; failover timings are simulated examples, not performance guarantees.

Network topology · Normal operations

FIBSATEDGERLYUGTERRESTRIALSATELLITEEDGE GATEWAYSURFACETUNNEL
Healthy route Standby Degraded
24 msModeled latency
0.1%Modeled loss
100%Battery reserve
—Modeled recovery

Normal topology. Fiber selected; satellite link provisioned as standby.

Inspect a node / packet

Select a node to see synthetic telemetry and transport metadata.

Recovery event ledger

Municipal Site Designer

Transparent first-pass sizing, editable assumptions, and a printable preliminary proposal.

NOT A CERTIFIED RF / STRUCTURAL DESIGN

Project assumptions

BB2G / SKYBRIDGE · PRELIMINARY SITE MEMO

Coastal Resilience Pilot

Location: To be surveyed

12.6Requested km²
5Planning relay nodes
12.8Battery kWh estimated
1WAN terminal paths

Preliminary equipment allowances

ComponentPlanning quantity
Terrestrial relay nodes—
Satellite WAN terminal (candidate)—
Edge gateway / firewall1
Usable battery energy / all relays—
Underground accessSurvey-required; not included

Methods and exclusions

This planning result is not a coverage prediction, manufacturer quote, installation BOM or price estimate. Real coverage depends on terrain, link budget, spectrum, mounting, topology, user density, backhaul, safety constraints and permitting.
Request a pilot

Hardware-in-the-Loop Lab

Safe integration staging for a ProBox or DGX Spark collector.

NO LIVE LAB CONNECTION CONFIGURED

Live Feed: BB2G Lab Node #01

OFFLINE / NOT CONNECTED. No real hardware readings are available to this public website. The values below appear only when you explicitly enable synthetic demonstration.

49 °CDemo CPU temp
0.2%Demo packet loss
18 msDemo latency
12.2 hDemo uptime

Synthetic example only. Never attach production credentials to this view.

Telemetry bridge integration contract

  • On ProBox: run an opt-in collector under a dedicated unprivileged account.
  • Collect allowlisted host metrics only: temperature, system load, link probes, uptime and power telemetry if sensors exist.
  • Transmit over outbound-only TLS to a private authenticated ingest gateway.
  • Validate signatures, apply rate limits and redact network addresses/secrets.
  • Keep real-time telemetry inside an authenticated operations view; expose only explicitly approved public aggregates.
Lab connectivity: Not commissioned

Acceptance gates

Before a production connection, require device enrollment, credentials management, explicit opt-in, timeout/failure behavior, provenance tags, retention limits, source schema validation, and a secure off switch.

Zero-Trust Provisioning

An interactive state-machine demonstration, not a substitute for hardware-backed attestation.

MOCK CREDENTIALS ONLY

Node commissioning walkthrough

Demonstrate device identity, attestation, authorization, session establishment and revocation.

AWAITING TEST

Trust-chain audit

Start a scenario to display the simulated decision sequence.

Real deployments require certificate lifecycle management, private key confinement in a TPM/secure element where supported, replay defense, attestation-policy validation and revocation infrastructure.

Engineering Workbench

Reproducible arithmetic with explicit assumptions and limits.

Free-space path loss · line of sight

113.72 dBFree-space path loss

FSPL = 32.44 + 20 log10(distance km) + 20 log10(frequency MHz). Excludes Fresnel obstruction, atmospheric loss, antenna gain, interference and fade margin. Not applicable to non-line-of-sight tunnel propagation.

Battery endurance estimator

26.7 hEstimated runtime at 80% usable energy

Does not account for temperature derating, aging, surge load, recharge, solar input, inverter efficiency beyond selected usable-energy factor, or mandated emergency reserve.

Next field tests

Acceptance evidence must include route failover time distributions (not just one example), radio-path and Fresnel surveys, actual traffic and link-quality captures, autonomy under measured load, enclosure environmental tolerances, and adversarial device-enrollment tests.